Akvod said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
theRepublic said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Euphoria14 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
waron said:
personally
gameplay>graphics
i'm more worried that this game will be unplayable thanks to maps were you will be killed 2 seconds after respawn by stray bullet or campers(this game can end up as a "run to the nearest safe spot and kill everything that respawns/move wit sniper rifle" campers game).
i don't care about the graphics as long as it have stellar framerate, won't have glitches and will be "clean"(no bad textures, models etc. and everything at the same level).
for me even first gen 360 games like Perfect Dark Zero looks good. |
EXACTLY! A shooter that requires 256 players also requires little skill to have many kills!
|
What would require more skill to consistently come out on top? A 1 vs 1, 10 player DM, 32 player DM or a 8 vs 8 x 16 TDM?
I wouldn't know, but I am hoping someone else does. All I know is that I won't touch a game like this with a 10-foot pole. Killzone 2 was way too intense for me and it was 32 players. This game would make me rip my hair out.
|
A one vs one is too obvious that one person will win. 32 player DM sounds about right. It's the truth man, i've been playing FPS for years and with 256 players on the map its going to be a spawn kill fest. I'm not saying don't buy it, i'm just giving my opinion from experience. KZ2 had the right amount of players, which is why everything turned out well. You can have players who are valued on your team by true skill. The battlefields are wide enough and that is a plus for KZ2. MAG is going to be a gigantic clusterfuck. Question though....how was KZ2 too intense? Man if that was intense you would've hated the old Call of Duty games lol.
|
As long as the map is big enough, 256 players would theoretically play just fine. The question is how big are the maps going to be.
|
Well from what i've seen the maps should be huge, but I noticed in the video that the players tend to flood certain areas. I saw like 30 guys on one side rushing another group of guys on the opposite team. It looks like a BF2 rip off.
|
I don't think the trailer gave an realistic depiction of the gameplay... Honestly, would you line up neatly with a dozzen people in one cramped spot?
|
In BF 1942 and 2 I had sweet spots, which included vehicles (Planes, tanks). My friends were assigned to certain vehicles, but I was good at all of them, so I couldn't be trusted when I was against them. A lot of my friends were on Battlefield teams. The only time you caught me out in the open was when my vehicle was out of commission. I was proficient in using rifles and sniper rifles though, so I was quite sneaky. In Battlefield if you were outside of a vehicle, your chances of death were extremely high....especially in a game with vast maps like Battlefield. The maps were freaking huge and sometimes you would only find 16 people playing per map. One skilled person flying a plane in these types of games is enough to take out multiple squads without breaking a sweat. If my friend Rico ends up playing this game and flies planes....god help you all. He is a cheap mother fucker and will bomb you until you cry for the game to end. He was crazy with 16 to 30 people on a map facing him. Imagine him going up against 256 people. It's like crushing ants in a clusterfuck. The thing about the MAG video that I saw was that I could even see the sniper amongst all the other classes.
