alephnull said:
Governments account for the vast majority financially of the things people would probably classify as charity. Those sheikhs provide the funding to build a lot of mosques and the citizens of many of those countries (not to be confused with the people who work there) are provided with nice fat stipends just for being born (and if it makes them less critical of the regimes so be it). Much like the guilded age robber barons, Gate's and Buffet's charities are politically necessary. Their public images affect their financial risk, influence, and power significantly. As astute political players, both with carefully crafted images, I'm sure they are not oblivious of this fact.
|
ofcourse, the political milege that powerful individuals derive from philantrophy is invaluable. But Bill gates has little to do with subsaharan AIDS or malaria in the tropics. Mosques, temples and churches are inseperable part of society and have their place but they cant replace education, a bowl of rice and a roof over your head.
Considering that the middle east has 50% of the world oil reserves(wonder how many xxxtrillion dollars that is) I wonder how much these rich chador princes ACTUALLY donate to the rest of the world, especially developing countries.
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.
owner of : atari 2600, commodore 64, NES,gameboy,atari lynx, genesis, saturn,neogeo,DC,PS2,GC,X360, Wii
5 THINGS I'd like to see before i knock out:
a. a AAA 3D sonic title
b. a nintendo developed game that has a "M rating"
c. redesgined PS controller
d. SEGA back in the console business
e. M$ out of the OS business







