BMaker11 said:
why would they? They didn't do it last gen, and they haven't done it this gen. Why would anything change? By the same token, I could say that M$ would dish out top dollar to get Gran Turismo. But no. Both companies did the best thing with gamers in mind. They made COMPETITION. M$ made Forza, Sony made Killzone. And no, it wasn't all just my opinion. And those "valid" points with links and what not were proven irrelevant (ie. "The 360 has more games....because of all the EA sports 2006 games and so on")
|
They didn't do it last gen because they didn't need to and they haven't done it this gen because they can't. There is no way in hell MS is selling their IP rights for Halo to Sony. Spin it how you want but Sony has fallen hard from last gen and if you don't think they would snatch up Halo in an instant given the opportunity then your delusional. And yes MS would also probably by the GT IP if given a chance but I'm sure Sony has locked down the rights to that title in a way that MS will not see it any time soon.
Also if you don't see how saying 360 has a larger library of better games because of sports games is not only a matter of opinion but honestly laughably ignorant then no amount of reason is going to get through your head.
The definitive evidence that video games turn people into mass murderers








