Do you think Nintendo´s next system could finally be "the new SNES"?

[twesterm]

Griffin said:

twesterm said:

Griffin said:

twesterm said:

I must have had a fixed copy along with every other reviewer out there because I don't remember busted controls or a busted camera.

Seriously, I doubt a game with something as major as busted controls or a busted camera would average a 97 on Metacritic.

 

The MGS and RE series have always suffered from bad controls/camera and look how well they scored.

 

 

So now I'm confused.  Super Mario Galaxy is a busted game because of its bad controls and bad camera, but Metal Gear Solid 4's busted camaera and controls make the PS3 have the superior action/adventure games?

 

I never said MGS4 made the PS3 have better games, my point was that bad controls and camera don't make a game score low.  And my opinion of the MGS series is not very high.  We can look at Killzone2 for example, its controls were god awful and i have no idea how GG could think people move like that in real life, but that game scored great overall based on the best sounding game and best looking game of all time.

 

 

I have to assume you don't disagree with saying MGS4 makes PS3 have the best action/adventure games since you didn't have anywhere near the same reaction as saying Super Mario Galaxy is busted for the same reasons.

It's called being consistent and you're just not that.  It's painfully obvious you're just making things up because the idea that something like Super Mario Galaxy could be better than something like Little Big Planet is just offensive to you.