By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Griffin said:
twesterm said:
Griffin said:
twesterm said:

I must have had a fixed copy along with every other reviewer out there because I don't remember busted controls or a busted camera.

Seriously, I doubt a game with something as major as busted controls or a busted camera would average a 97 on Metacritic.

 

The MGS and RE series have always suffered from bad controls/camera and look how well they scored.

 

 

So now I'm confused.  Super Mario Galaxy is a busted game because of its bad controls and bad camera, but Metal Gear Solid 4's busted camaera and controls make the PS3 have the superior action/adventure games?

 

I never said MGS4 made the PS3 have better games, my point was that bad controls and camera don't make a game score low.  And my opinion of the MGS series is not very high.  We can look at Killzone2 for example, its controls were god awful and i have no idea how GG could think people move like that in real life, but that game scored great overall based on the best sounding game and best looking game of all time.

 

Wiimote is just something you have to get used to like dual analog shooters, once you are good with it, the problems pretty much disappear into thin air, other than that, I think the only time I bitched about SMG camera angle is the stage with a lot of lava flying around and every platform slowly sinking only later to realize that I wasn't pushing the analog stick efficiently enough so that was my own fault. I also hope you are not bitching about the last few galaxies, those are supposed to be hard.