Reasonable said:
I'd say the opposite was true. Sony were so sure the PS3 was going to win they put BR in to try for a double win with both the console and the format. I doubt they figured PS3 would fail so stick in BR anyway - what would be the point of that? You wouldn't imagine it would ensure BR victory in the format war, would you? I believe they figured Nintendo had no chance after the Gamecube and saw MS as a threat to head of by pushing out a high spec console to match their approach - i.e. they'd get the traditional audience plus steal the audience MS was growing with the Xbox/Live. Instead they got caught both ways - Nintendo came out the traps like gangbusters and the delay to market for PS3 let the 360 grab a vital lead in US/UK market with the shooter/online crowd. Doesn't mean they won't learn their lesson for a PS4 though - at the end of the day, whatever people say, you don't end up with the sales of PS1/PS2 by accident or because you don't know what you're doing. In some ways I feel it's MS who still have the most to prove - they've shown steady growth since the first Xbox launched, but never a real surge that indicates they could reach PS1/PS2/Wii heights of HW sales. Of course, if they can keep the growth pattern strong then while this gen they won't be first they could have a shot the following gen.
|
I never said they knew the PS3 would fail. I stated that they knew it wouldn't be in first because of the price. Sony isn't a stupid company. Wanna know what they didn't expect? They didn't expect Microsoft to be in second and them in third.







