Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
Ausfalcon said:
Mike, you have never publically agreed with the tons of other folks who have pointed out how you troll either across multiple sites across varying subject matter. I certainly don't expect myself to be able to fair any better there. I've provided links that others can read, and spending about 15 minutes beyond that with google if they care to will provide more of the same. Let alone the fact that people on this very board were already saying the same thing about you before I ever posted a word here. They don't need to rely on the assessment of others. Its all there in how you post. Those other assessments just may help some folks see your pattern of approach for stealth trolling a bit more quickly.
|
I thought trolls hardly ever post anything to back up what they say. Usually trolls just say a bunch of crap without evidence. Ex: Calling someone a troll without proving the data provided is untrue for the sole purpose of trying to discredit them.
Looking at the title of this thread, I know that statement is correct. Yet, people were basically trying to say he was wrong about this very basic truth. Why is that? Why are people fighting the truth with such fervor? It must be Cognitive Dissonance (CD) at play.
Here is the breakdown of X360 read speed over a DL DVD disc:
First column is diamter in mm, second is area of that volume in square mm's.
119 -----11116.385 <--- Area of DVD in mm (120mm-1mm for buffer)
37 -----1074.665 <--- Area of center (36mm +1mm for buffer)
10041.72 <---- total usable area of DVD9 in square mm
First column is diameter in mm, second is how fast data is read at that point on the disk:
119 -----8x <--- 8x speed at outermost point
37 -----3.3 <--- 3.3x speed at innermost point
78 -----5.65
98.5 -----6.825
88.25 -----6.2375
93.375 -----6.53125
95.9375 -----6.678125 <--- 6.678x pointe where data from here on out is read faster than Blu (6.678*10.8 = 72.1MBps, Blu reads at 72MBps)
95.9375 7225.143066 - center volume (1074.665) = 6150.478066 <--Area of volume that's read slower than Blu, or 61.25% of total usable volume.
38.75% of a DVD9 is read equal to, or faster than 6.78x (which is faster than Blu-ray)
38.75% of 7gigs = 2.71GB
|
Your calculations fall flat on their face because the DVD is read at 12x at the outermost point. It's a shame you didn't bother reading the last 2-3 pages. Namely, my posts.
You obviously haven't read anything or you'd see that nobody at this point is disputing that there is 6.8GB of data available to be read for game data on an Xbox 360 game disc.
So kindly edit your post please and stop spreading FUD that looks like it's true to the average noob.
