If Microsoft matches Sony price cut, would the PS3 still do "gangbusters"?

[theprof00]

Rpruett said:

pbroy said:
@Rpruett

Sesitive much? Careful man, might pop a blood vessel.

Learn how to read my post right, before you go in defensive mode so easily.

I said, If trophies wouldn't have been implimented, some people wouldn't hold off on playing games, not knowing if a trophy patch will be released later on.

Achievements are in every 360 game and is a complete system. Wii games not having Achievements is a complete system. I don't care if every game after 2009 gets trophies, that's not my point.

Oh I assure you,  I'm not in defensive mode.  It was just an utterly retarded post.  Sorry.

 

A. ) This premise that trophies are driving purchases and sales is absolutely and utterly retarded.

B.)  Either Achievements/Trophies matter ... or they don't.   Your argument is totally illogical.  Wii games not having trophies makes it a complete system.  Xbox 360 games having trophies makes it a complete system.  Lol.  That's an argument that a 12 year old would try to make.  I expect better.

 

@rpruett. I really think you should watch your tone. Pbroy has a very good point that you can't seem to understand.

I for one bought valkyria chronicles and still haven't played it yet. It's still sealed in a box because I don't want to play it if trophies come out for it. They've never said they aren't coming out, but until they give me some kind of closure on the subject I won't play it. I bought it because I thought the update would have it. If there was no update I wouldn't have bought it yet.

It's not that I don't want to play it. It's just that there are soo many great games out right now that I want to devote my attention to and I hate replaying games. Unfortunately games with trophies like killzone and gundam simply take priority right now.

I am not a bad gamer for doing this. I am a smart gamer who works and goes to school for about 80 hours a week.