By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Lolcislaw said:
LordTheNightKnight said:
So trying an experimental art style means they don't care about the Wii? So not doing the safe and expected is not respecting. Bull.

"I really expected a solid graphics engine build from the ground for the Wii"

Is that the only think that's used to measure respect for the Wii now?

It does not work that way. You cannot read how much a company supposedly loves a system by what you think the graphics should be. EA is still making games for the Wii. They made a deal to get an EARLIER release of Motion+.

But graphics on one game suddenly makes you forget all that?

Well i usually do not care for the graphics, these are actually cool, animations are fluid(and i wrote that in a previous post). Its just the artstyle that i personally do not like in this game that's it. I like arcade-y games, stylised graphics in most of games, its just games like FIFA, Madden etc. etc. for me should look simple without much stylistation. Maybe after i'll see more from this game i will change my mind, but it really puzzles me why did EA go this way with madden on the Wii .

Oh and its obvious that EA does care for the Wii, TW looks great Grand Slam Tennis also seems very interesting. They definately are putting loads of effort into those titles. Im not questioning that.

oh well now back to writing my essay...

 

Sorry. That comment made me think you were graphics whoring. Glad to see you are not.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs