Hephaestos said:
mowe said:
Hephaestos said:
#
8.5 Graphics
Excellent artistic direction combined with clever use of the Wii's modest graphical prowess. The environment lacks technical details, but the clever design work makes up for this.
#
FU IGN, can't even write a Wii review without spitting at it in some way. if a game has perfect graphics for a Wii game, give it a 9.5 or 10 don't say the graphics are crap cause of the console being less than the HDs... I didn't see them comparing PS2 games to PC games graphics last gen... that or compare everything to real life and give everything a 0 (besides cell shading that does do a good job at imitating real life drawings) |
OK buddy, don't be hatin' to be hatin'. 8.5 is an excellent score, and doesn't seem to have had any effect on the final rating. This reviewer thought the environment lacked technical details, and docked the game appropriately. It's his review, and he has to note whatever flaws he sees. He clearly still loved the game, so why do you have to get all hostile?
|
cause of the "clever use of the Wii's modest graphical prowess" which is as hostile as you can get without insulting.
I know the score is good, it's at the constant free jabbing at the Wii on IGN that i'm pissed, not at this review in particular.
And no it's not HIS review, it's IGN's review, the guy is paid for giving a fair view, but the guys at IGN think too highly of themselves... I mean it's a job, some of these guys should get a warning, some others even deserve to be fired for their constant free trashing. This makes the site loose customers, I know i'm one and what pisses me of is that I liked the site before the wii started it's reign, now I can't read a Wii article on it without seeing sarcasm everywhere...
|
Way to make a big deal about nothing.
