Wow, this was a really bad article. Sorry to the folks who agreed with it early in the thread but I really think you were just enjoying the hype and not really thinking about what was written here. There is really no reason to think what he is saying is true, and the logic he uses to come to the conclusion is fairly flawed and makes a number of assumptions.
I can think of a few reasons why they would be willing to do what they have done that mean the exact opposite of the conclusion he has come to. For instance, maybe MS believes Sony is weak now and if they can steal big titles now they can kill the beast before it gets going. It would explain what they have done and doesn't spell doom for the 360. Is this hypothesis any more valid or correct than his? Absolutely not, they are both purely based on conjecture and speculation.
 |
| To Each Man, Responsibility |
