By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Soriku said:
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
Words Of Wisdom said:
Khuutra said:

I think Fire Emblem works better on handhelds than it does on consoles, but I wouldn't balk at a Wii game.

You should play both Pool of Radiance and Radiant Dawn before making that statement.

Sure you don't mean "Path of Radiance"?


OT: I'm expecting DS for this. Sure, could be Wii, and I wouldn't be disappointed, but I think budgetwise and profitwise DS makes more sense for Nintendo right now.
Anyone know when the next Nintendo Dream comes?

 

wat? The guys who make over a billion a quarter would have problems like this?

They need a new FE for Wii to raise sales and have more core games for Wii...

I hope it'd have better online than FE: SD for DS.

 

 Have you even played the online for SD?

FE11 (SD) is the worst FE in this millenia. By far. The online, however, is pretty good. (The game is great, but was tons worse than I expected. The online is decent, and far better than I expected.

So essentially, don't make statements about games you haven't played.

 

Oh, and there's little that means less for hardware than Fire Emblem.

 

I'm guessing one of these things.

1) A Wii game. Full game, not a remake.

2) A DS game. Remake.

3) Thracia 776 / Holy light release on VC in Americas.

 

 



http://www.vgchartz.com/games/userreviewdisp.php?id=261

That is VGChartz LONGEST review. And it's NOT Cute Kitten DS