By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kn said:
The "stuff" is generally corporate property as they are an employee of the corporation. I would imagine that 90+ percent of the "swag" stays in the office for use by anyone... Review guides are standard practice. Review embargoes are to protect their financial interest. I don't have a problem with any of them...

This is soooo funny. Where are you all basing this off of? Source, please.

Some reviewers get swag - the TV reviewer at the paper gets swag and donates it so everyone can buy it. And guides? Unless any of you can provide a source or two, the Lair guide is pretty much unheard of.

If a developer/publisher/PR firm sends me a guide, I toss it. No, thanks. Let me play the game and see if it's a pile of steaming crap ... I don't need spin or hype. 

The problem in journalism period is ethics. You can not be swayed by bribes and the like. That's why most publications have a rule about keeping stuff. You don't. You donate it back to the company. Now, if you buy it, sweet.

Embargoes are set by the publisher/developer/PR firm and as a journalist, you can't break them. So what ...

And trips and stuff ... unless my paper pays for it, getting a free trip completely goes over the line. You don't think a week in Fiji will sway your thinking?