JRPG said:
Well technically i got banned for saying the PS2 rivaled the Wii in power...
and i may or may not have called someone a pussy.
|
Lol, well I can't help you much with that second part but the PS2 doesn't rival the Wii in overall capabiilities. There can be said that some facets it does do better than Wii such as the fact it could output some games at 1080i resolution but that's a hardware limited factor on Wii and not really horsepower. The Wii can do 1080i because the fill rate dictates how many pixels can be rendered and the Wii has plenty of muscle to do it.
The biggest problem with these kinds of debates is that different architectures aren't directly comparable on a per number basis. For example, the GC's CPU was clocked at 485 Mhz and the Xbox's CPU was clocked at 733 Mhz. The numbers make the Xbox CPU look almost twice as powerful but in reality the GC processor was on par performance wise because it was built on copper (as is Wii) instead of aluminum which allowed it to perform more operations per clock cycle.
To be honest, if you're not really familiar with how they work and what the numbers truly mean, it's best not to try and compare the consoles. This is precisely why Nintendo decided not to reveal the actual hardware specifications for Wii because most people won't be able to put them in proper context and will instead comapre numbers directly.
The rEVOLution is not being televised







