The holocaust was a terrible thing.
That said, I do recall a few years back the Oxford university debate society got a famous holocaust denier in as a guest speaker for a debate. The papers here went insane saying how he should not have been allowed to support his beliefs because they were wrong.
Now forgive me if I'm wrong but isn't the sole objective of a debate to have two opposing sides? If a load of people say one side does not deserve a voice then it is just going to be a load of people agreeing, which is not a fun debate.
Bottom line: They are glaringly wrong, but I support their rights to say it.







