The Ghost of RubangB said:
Wow, you're getting wronger and wronger. You're talking about standup comedy. There was a huge shift in how standup comedy worked thanks to Lenny Bruce and George Carlin. You might call it a standup revolution that changed standup forever. So yes, standup comedy from before that change has aged horribly. Standup since then... hasn't changed at all. Film comedies have nothing to do with standup comedy. When you're talking about films... aw screw it, just go to Google and type in "funniest films of all time" or "best comedies of all time" and tell me what years they came out in.. It's gonna be Dr. Strangelove from 1964, Ghostbusters from 1984, and a bunch of other stuff that goes all the way back to Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, and the Marx Brothers. Not too many movies from the 2000s though. You want to talk about subjective taste, go ahead. I'm a film major. It's really fun for me. If you want to talk about "success" in a vague way, then you need to discuss the artistic goals of the work in question, to determine whether it succeeded or not. But if you want to talk about the success of a big budget blockbuster film, that goal was definitely to make a ton of money. So yes, Ghostbusters was the most successful comedy of the 1980s. It is also highly regarded as one of the greatest comedies of all time.
And no no no no, real good art doesn't get stale. I still love the Beatles, Super Mario Bros., Ghostbusters, the Muppets, Shakespeare, Dr. Seuss, Picasso, a nice glass of champagne, a good sonnet, and a good burrito, and I always will. How dare you.
|
Well, the fact that you used the word "wronger" tells me that I am done arguing with you...I guess your studies don't include learning how to speak and write, which is strange considering you are a film major.








