madskillz on 27 September 2007
| Gamerace said: @twestern - I havn't played Oblivion (my PC can't handle it... sniff, sniff) sorry if it was a poor choice. @madskillz - It must be hard to balance giving fair reviews and not biting the hand that feeds you, so to speak, by pissing off the publishers. I notice IGN generally gives favorable previews, but then reviews are often lower than you'd expect based on the previews (Red Steel notably comes to mind). How do you handle that balance? |
Hay Gamerace,
Yes, it can be hard at times. I was explaining that on an atari.com thread. I have an important job - to present honest facts about games - it's not like a movie review, or a CD review. We are talking about $60 and making a case for a gamer, who trusts your judgment, not to rent but buy a game. Some games are garbage - but that's how you work your way up. I am sure that ign.com and gamespot guys can literally pick and choose whatever they want. Sometimes, they'll write a review - other times, they'll let readers do it.
Another thing - keeping it fresh. I was an avid gamer before I did reviews. Now? I pick EVERY GAME I PLAY apart. I was doing it with Halo 3 - asking myself why should anyone buy this game? I do have fun with the games, but not as much. The lines really blur between gaming and work and that can be hard. There are tons of benefits reviewing games, but you have to find some balance. I am thankful for being able to review games - and I really respect folks that can get honest reviews about games. I hate guys/gals that just rewrite press releases.
Here are a few of my stories ... all feedback is appreciated!
I will admit, most PR firms/developers/publishers were really receptive and will send games that I request - for Bioshock and Halo 3, I did get a retail copy in advance. For others, I have to *remind* them about shipping me a copy. I haven't gotten a rejection yet, so that's good.
