JRPG said:
Don't give me that. Realistc games looked fine last gen, why the hell would they not look like that on the Wii. Everyone says that the Wii is as strong as an original Xbox. If that is the case then they could make it look as realistic as the any game on the xbox. You know why they did not do that? Cause the Wii is a kid's console and this style appeals to them more. Thats the hard truth. Get over it. |
lol.
I'm 33 years old. I enjoy my Wii. I also do and would enjoy a PS360. However, with my family and work I don't have time to play more than one console, so I bought Wii due to certain Nintendo branded games.
My teenage brothers have a 360 and routinely bust my balls for not buying one. However, everytime I get a new game they play it at my house a lot. In fact the kids I know (immediate friends/family kids) aged 5-16 all talk and hype more about their 360's than their Wii's. They all play them more, mostly due to FPS and online features. Two areas that may finally be eliminated with the coming of Conduit.
Just because something is not imaged in a realistic manner does not make it kiddie. Certain games are definitely kiddie, but, the differences between the Wii and PS360 versions of Ghostbusters don't seem to be a kiddie theme. In fact they seem to have the exact same theme, its just an art style difference.
I think both look cool in their own, way, but from what I've been reading, many are saying the Wii version is better. Probably because of the controls and the unique art style.
Madworld was very cartoony. Yet it definitely isn't a kiddie game. I actually only played it after my kids were in bed.
You sir seem to be the child and by your logic should only be playing a Wii.
