JRPG said:
twesterm said:
JRPG said:
ITT: Wii apologists
I'm not a graphic whore by any means, but this kind of crap is ridiculous. I don't know why i'm even arguing with you, you guys even defend the shovelware on the wii. |
What kind of crap are you talking about?
You're the one not listening-- this is not a port or a dumbed down version of the PS3/360/PC versions. I really don't know how to say that any more clearly.
This isn't something like Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix where it's the same game with muddier textures and motion controls, it is a different game. I mean really, you arguing it any further would probably be just trolling because you are flat out wrong and just trying to spread misinformation at that point.
|
Yeah, i get thats its a "different game", but its still the same game. Just like how Splinter Cell Double Agent on the 360 is a "different game" than the PS2/GCN/Xbox one. Its still the same game just crappy and somewhat different.
|
I don't know SPlinter Cell so I don't know how different those were, but again, this is a different game.
What you're doing is similiar to calling Super Mario Bros 3 and Mario 64 the same game because they're both a platformer where you solve jumping puzzles starring Mario where he's trying to save the princess when they are in fact very different games.
One final time-- the Wii version is not a port and it's not just a dumbed down somewhat different game. It is a different game.
