Dark Chaos said:
GameAnalyser said:
nightsurge said:
GameAnalyser said:
@nightsurge
U don't get it..sony had to pay the price for doing the stuff last gen with ps2 that eventually led them to huge success...but now according to Sony hardware PR 3rd party exclusivity has been declared as non functional..they are no longer interested in luring 3rd party exclusivities which doesn't mean that MS has rights to continue owing to ps2. They are assisting every single 3rd party devs to keep the lead. And u can't deny it.. |
This line explains just how retarded Sony is. They won the last 2 generations by immense third party support, and now that they are far behind, they claim to not need it and have shifted to first party.
Microsoft is assisting third parties just the same as Sony. The only other times MS has anything to do with it is with DLC.
And what are you even trying to say in that red section? Seriously for a "game analyser", which analyzer is spelled wrong by the way, you don't know your stuff.
|
Well i mite be not so grammatically sharp as u..but i can still correct myself with such suggestions.
On topic.. Sony wants to prove that this gen even w/o third party they will be able to stay in the market, just not being retarded but playing fair. If u can convince me by end of 2009 that sales of 360 would surge to a gap of more than 20 million, then they are looting all from (retarded)Sony this gen the way ps2 did over GC and xbox. By saying the rate @ which console's h/w sales hover around ps3 range I don't consider any luck. Maybe a slim 360 mite stand chance..who knows..we will c.
|
What do u mean by that?
|
I meant Sony deliberately dropped 3rd party exclusivity to play fair. Moreover they are not intending to waste a declining revenue over ps3 production costs by trying to lure 3rd party devs..
