off-topic:
Why isn't Mike at least considered a contributer? This may be a little premature on my part, but his opinion is something I've always respected because he only talks about what he knows about, is very factual, always backs up his points and is rarely ever wrong. I think, in my opinion of what I've read from various people on this site, that he's one of the most intellectual people on here. I respect his opinion more than over half the mods - no offense, but very VERY VERY few people on this site show the maturity that he does..I'd say DKII, Brett, Benga and maybe 1 or 2 others have as well formulated arguments and opinions as Mike, but he posts much more than any of them besides maybe Benga Benga.
Just curious, did they ask you and you turn it down or something Mike? You should at least get the dark-blue name=P
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
