Better for all, Capitalism or Socialism?

[tombi123]

TheRealMafoo said:

tombi123 said:

TheRealMafoo said:

 

A world with no money, is socialism.

I disagree. A completely socialist nation would distribute all the money equally. How can a world with no money distribute it? A socialist nation takes from the rich and gives to the poor. In a world with no money, there is no rich and poor.

 

 

Money is nothing more then a country putting a value on your contribution to society.

If you work at a jib that requires more skill, you get paid more. If you work at a job that requires more talent, you get paid more

Taking the money and distributing it equally, just means you feel everyones contributions holds the same value.

Having no money at all, means you feel everyones contributions holds the same value.

it's the exact same thing.

 

??? Everyone has an equal amonut of money because there is no money??? I suppose it is socialistis in the sense that everyone has the same amount of money... but in a world without money, nobody has any use for money...

I'm going to watch Lost now, so I won't reply for about an hour