So basically you guys are reviewing old games in hopes of getting new review copy's. The base of that hope is called VGchartz and that website is often criticized for it's lack of sales data. I personally do see that gathering intel is difficult, but the general view on VG simply isn't that positive and even as the only site that try's to get their numbers straight, this site is only mentioned a handful of times as a source on other articles.
I still don't see the point in reviewing age old games, and I'd still like to empathize to put more focus on the core of this site. That's where you will get your reliability from and ultimately free review copy's. Not from reviewing Killzone 1 when 2 just got released. Metacritic will place your reviews as your visitor numbers grow anyway, and for growing numbers you need...
To summarize: Focus on the core business to be deemed as a trustworthy site. Not on have been reviews.
P.s, this is of course not meant as a bash on reviewers. Just to be clear on that.
PSN name: Gazz1979 (feel free to add me, but please put your Vgchartz name in the message!)
Battlefield 2: Gazz1979
