Since a lot of salenumbers here are incomplete.....

[The Ghost of RubangB]

Gazz said:

nordlead said:

Gazz said:

I can't be the only one who thinks that reviews of age old games are a waste of time. This site is for sales data and not named VG old games reviews. I loved Shadow of the collosus for example, but I know about that game already and the internet is filled with info and reviews on it. Sales data however seems to be poorly documented.

I can't be the only one here who expects a sales data site to focus on it's core right? Especially when the core is still filled with huge holes..

the people who write reviews are not statisticians so it isn't a waste of resources. If you see brett or the source writing old reviews then you can complain.

you people are so whiny

So look for statiscians instead of wasting time on reviewers. The foundation needs work to provide a solid base for further developments like age old reviews.com. Do sites like gamerankings even bother to add them anyway or are these reviews in complete vain? New games do come out though, perhaps shifting focus on them instead of GT5 Proloque is worth more.

The reviewers are volunteers and aren't wasting our resources at all.  They're helping out because they want to, and not slowing down any other part of the web site.

Also, older reviews are always worthwhile, because people still buy older games all the time.  You may have noticed year-old games like Wii Sports and Mario Kart Wii at the top of the sales charts.  Some games sell forever, and some games disappear right away even though we all love them.  Some people may have been on the fence for a long time, and a review might help them to inform themselves on whether they should rent it or buy it.

The sales data is a work in progress, and so are the reviews.  And neither are slowing each other down at all.  So chill out.