By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
Jo21 said:
Final-Fan said:
But see now you're saying that Intel has anticompetitive business tactics.  Suppose that Intel was nice as could be, "I'll do my thing and you do yours AMD, and may God defend the right"; would Intel still be anticompetitive just because of the fact that Intel is bigger than AMD?  Because that's what you said about Apple iTunes.
no thats not the reason, a not because it bigger you are missing part of the convesation i said they are anticompetive because they don't let other players play their music from their store, only ipods could play before.

while for a while being biggest music online store, but now with amazon pressure they are selling undrmed stuff like amazon. mp3 256kbps undrmed service.

similar intel is trying to do with AMD, locking up licensings of X86 archicture.

But isn't that "USED to be anticompetitive" -- not "IS anticompetitive"?  There's a difference.

No, it still *IS* anti-competetive.  iTunes still has DRM on all of it's video files.  Amazon does too (WMDRM) but the windows media DRM system works on most media players (not iPod, but MS would gladly license WMDRM to Apple - they're not trying to stop anyone from supporting WMDRM).