WereKitten said:
Weird logic. As little as I like the concept of "greatest story of all time", that surely means the greatest as in the prevalent opinion among those who actually read/experienced it and can pit it against other stories. People who did not read it may claim that _for them_ the greatest story is a different one, but that's the wrong data to collect - popularity - because they have no informed opinion about how it would rank against something they did not read. In other words: "Romeo and Juliet" surely isn't popular among secluded pygmy tribes, but I'm sure they would rate it very highly if someone took the time to translate it (or enact it) for them.
|
Adding to this, there are at least three ways in which a story (or work of art) can be evaluated. These are; (informed) popular opinion, academic study, and personal experience. Either way it's a subjective notion on which there will never be any real unanimity, and Monyleux would do well to remember that.
Also, I will say I generally dislike the "LITERATURE ROCKS!!1! lol!!" sentiment that is prevalent on these boards. It is very much the same kind of hubris that Molyneux displays in these interviews. The truth of the matter is that there are so many ways of expression other than the written word, and so many stories that can only be told through other media - video games included - that I find statements like "Books are just superior to Games in terms of storytelling and always will be" to be mind-bogglingly ignorant at best.







