Nintendo criticised by Greenpeace

[WereKitten]

scottie said:

Procrastinato said:

scottie said:
Nintendo, as did Apple, lost points not because they have bad environmental policy, but because they do not give infomation to Greenpeace. If a company does not provide Greenpeace with the info, GP counts it as if they fail to meet the standards

 

Exactly.  Kinda like "my client declines to answer" in a court of law.  Silence means angelic behavior, of course.  All those other companies are just trolling for good PR.  Its Nintendo who <3 Earth.

 

Straw man much?

 

My argument - If you have no infomation, you cannot just assume the worst

Your interpretation of my argument - If you have no infomation, you can assume the best

 

I'm sorry, but I shall not be responding to your post any more than that. Re read my point, and if you correctly interpret what I am saying, then I shall respond

Did you at least read the report, or even this thread? It was explained yet.

The report ranks the companies' public policies about toxic chemicals, e-waste management, energy consumption.

No publicly stated policy= 0 points. It's not assuming the worst for the products. It is giving 0 point to the public communication about them.

Geesh. First read, then write.