@Sethnintendo
Please, re-read my previous post: they are ranking _policies_, not products.
Nintendo could have the most environment-friendly console now. Or maybe not. But the point is: what is Nintendo's policy about e-waste? When they produce their _next_ console, do they have internal guidelines for their designers? Do they submit their products to external parties for an independent control about the dangerous chemicals? Are they aiming for a certification about their power consumption?
The fact that we, here, today, say that there are "probably not many Nintendo consoles in the dumps" does not make a pubic statement of a policy for the general consumer.
The public statement of a policy is an agreement of a kind that regards the future. It's about commitment and communication.
Nintendo apparently didn't care enough about this request of commitment to communicate their plans. And Greenpeace is rating low this lack of communication.
