| endimion said: I meant good post sorry.... it's just that people are whining when some one is challenging VGC number... I think it's a good way to remind you that this is just statistical approximation and in no way a holly truth.... and that's vallid for other charts too..... and for that reason people should be challenging them just to make those approximation more accurate by bringing balence to them.... in a positive way..... that article could be right or wrong it's not the mater... it allows us to remeber that with a different sample or a different way to studdy a same market you come up with different numbers and at the same time be as accurate as VGC or other site with those different numbers.... (i'm not sure you'll get what I meant, in short challenging statistical hypothesis is the best way to make them more accurate/true) |
Challenging it with a article based on a misreading of a press release has got to be a bad way to do it.
