I know what you were trying to imply with your argument. What I wanted to say is that god is not necessary to explain the world and I can very well imagine a world without god having created it
You can't just use god as the beginning of everything just because we can't explain how it worked yet. And it is dangerous. I could tell you why Satan created the world that way, too. Then that would be my belief vs your belief. So which one is more valid then?
Oh and of course the second world war was a chain of actions, everything is. What I'm telling you is that you can't assume there is a "deeper meaning" (= God's will) to the flour on the floor but not to Hitler. It doesn't work that way. You can't just cherry-pick the things that support your argument and let the others slip. Using this way of thinking every single Nazi on this world would have a "legitimate" reason for the second world war. How do you know what god wanted and what not? Maybe he didn't want you to meet your wife but he wanted Hitler to start a war?
See what I mean? This way of thinking is dangerous. Other people could abuse it in terrible ways.







