Kasz216 said:
That arguement seems a bit specious. To a lot of religious faiths the presense of god is in of itself a sense. As such it would be like trying to explain vision to a blind person... even scientifically it'd be hard to get. Some people have infact suggested that such a percetion, whether there is a god or not is tied to the temporal lobes. Whether it is a sense of a higher consiousness, a sense of something else we currently can't understand or simply a hallucinary feeling is unknown.
|
I thought I would ask pretty much the same question but in reverse. It is hard to prove the existance of a god, but proving a specific one is nigh on impossible. Even your arguement there, which was very good by the way, you did well, does not answer my question. Sorry Kasz.
@ thread: As Wraithpriest said, atheists are expected to justify why they don't believe in a god over and over and no-one ever accepts why we don't. People were hassling sci-fiboy about it earlier. But when asked the same question in reverse it gets weird for them. Asking someone to justify their specific god is just as theoligically viable question as asking someone why they don't believe in one at all.
