HappySqurriel said:
Value implies what you can sell it for ... What you and most of the Sony Fanboys can't seem to grasp is that $400 (and $600) is not too expensive for people to pay for a PS3, people (on the whole) don't see the PS3 as being worth $400 so its hard to argue that the hardware that made the PS3 dramatically more expensive than traditional console made it more valuable when so many people reject it because its not worth the new higher price. |
Sony can sell the PS3 at $400. A full $150 higher than it's closest competitor. As it relates to the Xbox 360. It's selling at a higher rate from release dates at a higher price since day one. On that essence alone, it is more valuable.
Ah yes, Sony fanboy. Lolcopter.
600$ is not too expensive for people to pay? Really? LOL. Quick name me how many $600 systems have ever done extremely well on the market? $600 was too expensive for the average consumer and the sales showed that. People as a whole don't see the PS3 as being worth $400 - $600 ? 21,000,000 people (And counting) disagree with you.
val⋅u⋅a⋅ble
<a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/audio.html/lunaWAV/V00/V0019700" target="_blank"><img src="http://cache.lexico.com/g/d/speaker.gif" border="0" /></a> [val-yoo-uh-buh
l, -yuh-buh
l]
Show IPA –adjective
| 1. | having considerable monetary worth; costing or bringing a high price: a valuable painting; a valuable crop. |
The dictionary says that you fail. Sorry.







