HappySqurriel said:
If my logic was so bad why couldn’t you answer the questions?
Anyways, there is a simple critical way that you can establish whether the “Value” argument holds water from a business perspective; if the addition of a component allows a system to be sold at a higher margin and/or to become more popular so that the overall profits from the product line increases then the value argument holds … On the other hand, if the margin of the product becomes worse and/or the product becomes less popular so that the overall profits from the product line remains constant or is reduced than the value argument doesn’t hold.
|
Value on it's purest form would imply does the PS3 contain more 'valuable' technology than the other systems. That is a resounding yes.
If I made two rings. One with a diamond and one with a quartz. The Diamond ring cost $2000 and the Quartz ring cost $50. Which is more valuable?
