Legend11 on 21 September 2007
| ookaze said: All of this because people can't admit that 1 disc is better than several. Swapping was always a problem, but people could stand it because there was no better solution. It's amazing that people want to eat crow in place of the company officials that said the nonsense. If your company officials made stupid comments like BluRay space was useless, and then games for his console starts needing 4 discs, well, that's their crow to eat, not yours. But no, the fanboys will go as far as saying they were right against all logic and against the facts. Sad... |
So is not having to swap discs for 2 games out of 200+, something that likely takes most people less than a minute and a half (30seconds to swap dvds x 3 dvds), really worth $160 (the likely additional cost the 360 would have been if it had came with a HD-DVD drive)?
