Bitmap Frogs said:
Yeah, that's what your avatar and username are for. So you don't have imply anything. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Bring now market studies backing your position or GTFO. Otherwise you are just making shit up to follow on your biased and agenda-driven posts. Yep, there must be. And you said what it is - but you didn't bring any supporting argument for it. Any. Therefore your whole post is just lies built atop your own biases. You are running a circular argument there: you are saying that the ps3 is favored in europe because the europeans like quality backing it up saying europeans like quality which is proved by the continent favoring the ps3. You are biased, your posts lack consistency and you post just to further your agenda. |
Down to personal attacks, way to support yourself.
Your flaw is in demanding that I "prove" my theory. But a theory shows strength merely in being consistent with the facts. Either admit that, or you have to "prove" that what I said is inconsistent with the facts (Japanese prefer low quality even though 360 is not selling there). But any such claims you offered would be INCONSISTENT with the facts.
I'm not saying my explanation explains all sales differences. Marketing, brand legacy, whether a region loves FPSs, these are all factors as well. Yep, it would be ridiculous for me to ask for "proof" that they are factors. Merely asking for the proof would show that I don't have a leg to stand on and couldn't offer a counterargument that is consistent with the facts.
Buh bye now! Btw, you aren't competent to ever summarize my arguments.
