Wow, there's so much foolishness in the TC's post, it almost makes my eyes bleed. Yes, they are opinions as are all other reviews. I've seen you saying "well in my world, blah blah blah," well I hate to be the one to tell you this but this isn't "your world."
I personally don't agree with all the review scores, but I mainly look at the review itself. And don't say "lots of people agree with me," more like the minority is loud ;) as is most of the time. And need I remind you, there isn't one sole person who reviews the games, it's a whole bunch of people, so when one review gets a higher score than another, it doesn't necessarily mean the site is saying "Game A is better than game B."
"DirtyP2002
I think the reviews are very Wii /Nintendo-friendly. Please don't ban me.
Halo3 getting 8.8 is just not what the game deserves. Check the stats bungie just published. 15 million User played it (!!!), 1 million user are playing it every day, still No. 15 on NPD, more than 75 weeks after the release.
On the other hand, we have got madworld getting a 8.7. I am not saying madworld is a bad game, but it is just not in the same league as Halo3 in any aspect.
This is no trolling, just my opinion."
Why have there been many PS3 that scored >90 and are some of the highest rated games on this site? Please don't post comments without thinking (or without blind fanboyism). Wow, Halo getting an 8.8, kind of reminds me of TP getting an 8.8, and people went crazy. Same thing happened on this site when Halo just got an 8.8.
Madworld has only been out a couple of weeks while Halo has been out over a year (I don't think Madworld will outsell it though, but I make a point). Also using the point # copies sold = quality game would then work for Wii Sports or Wii Play (which don't get me wrong, are decent games, but not exactly AAA titles). I probably would have given Halo 3 a 9 and Madworld an 8.5. I do think Madworld does compare to Halo (flame me :P).
This is not flaming, this is just my opinion of your opinion.
