CryEngine 3 showing 360parts vs ps3parts

[vlad321]

ssj12 said:

vlad321 said:

ssj12 said:

vlad321 said:

ssj12 said:

vlad321 said:

ssj12 said:
looks good but there are some hang-ups the PC version of the engine wont have.

 

Considering it's been out for the PC for 2 years, I'd hope so.

 

No, both Crysis games run on CryEngine 2. This is CryEngine 3 which farther improved that engine.

 

Well, I must be missing something, but this looks more like CryEngine 2.25 to me.

 

incremental updates for many engines are pretty much bug fixes and they add some minor features that were nearly finished for the main build but missed deadline.

Crysis used CryEngine 2

Crysis Warhead used CryEngine 2.?

 

I will straight up say that CryEngine 3 passed Crysis Warhead in graphics and physics even on the two HD consoles. I can't wait to see what it can do on say a Core i7 650 or 750 with Tri-Sli or CrossFireX.

 

Ok, THIS is incrementation of engines:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/81/Unreal_Engine_Comparison.jpg

Not what you showed me. THat's CE2.25.

You do realize there is an Unreal Engine 1.5, UE2.1, UE2.5. UE2XBE, UE3.1, UE3.2 right?

There really isnt much the CryEngine 3 can improve on except for texture detail, physics, and other things that affect the overall feel of a game. It seems it accomplishes this.

 

You just prooved my point. Epic didn't call UE2.5 UE3, they called it UE2.5. CryEngine 3 shouldn't even be Cryengine 3, it should be much closer to 2. Hell they even use the same friken models (the nanosuit) in 3 as they did in 2.