By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zkuq said:
vlad321 said:
Let me get this straight, 2 years down the road and all we get is.... this? Seriously? What a waste of human time and manpower. Epic went from UE2 to UE3 in 4 years yes, but the jump between 2 and 3 was huge. This? This is just wasted time.

Well, even if it's not very impressive compared to CE2, it doesn't mean it's not impressive compared to other engines. CryEngine 2 is still easily the most impressive engine on the market (CE3 isn't on the market yet), and its only drawback is its high system requirements. Anyway, right now hardware is the limiting factor; there isn't much room for improvement until devs learn the systems even better than now.

 

Honestly, hardware is only limiting the consoles, not the PC. Basically they spent 2 years keeping tech at a level when the hardware is getting better and better. You don't even need a super expensive PC to run CryEngine 2 now. Would have been better if they had worked on their AI or making a noticeable difference on CryEngine 2 (iono how they'd manage that, honestly).



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835