theRepublic said:
Baki said:
Soriku said:
Megadude said:
Soriku said:
Baki said:
BengaBenga said:
I don't disagree that PS360 would have been better for the Japanese sales and probably even Western sales. However Japanese devs are not very much used to multiplatform development.
Other than that the article sounds like complaint #100 about how the PS3 doesn't have JRPGs and how it's their own fault that their sales are down by ignoring the PS3.
The PS3 fanboy aspect of this article becomes even clearer because it complete ignores Wii as a platform, while everything the aurthor writes could also be, even more, applied to Wii. But by the time Wii and PS3 launched most devs had already gone with 360.
|
I ignored the DS and PSP as well. Thats because this article was about HD gaming. Plus putting the games on the Wii would mean some gameplay changes for the games.
This particular article is talking about an alternative that the developers chose to ignore. An alternative where the game would've remained relatively the same.
And yes, in a way, this is a complaint about developers ignoring the PS3 to its own detriment in favour of an Xbox 360 exclusive.
|
No it doesn't. Not all Wii games require waggle (esp not JRPGs). |
A Wii game without a waggle is basicly a Gamcube game.
|
Uh...no, |
Wouldn't that defeat the purpose of putting it on the Wii. Might as well put it on the PS2 if you're not going to play to the platforms strengths. Not to mention that not everyone has a classic controller and controlling a game normally using the Wii mote is not comfortable at all.
|
You have got to be kidding. The simple fact that you are not locked in to having your hands three inches apart makes the Wiimote/Nunchuck combination extremely comfortable.
|
That actually is my favorite part of the Wiimote/nunchuck.
Really it's why i'd take games that were equal in everything except graphics on the Wii.
It's why I bought Power Pros on Wii rather then 20 dollars cheaper on PS2.
