IGN: Why DVD's better than Blu-Ray....

[Kos-mos]

Khuutra said:

Kos-mos said:

Khuutra said:

Kos-mos said:

It has better prize, but IT isn`t better. Needs isn`t the same as better. It is better, but people don`t need it? Well, in very very few cases. So I think I understand the word BETTER perfectly.

But the downloading has something to do with the NEEDS of something BETTER, right?

No, this shows pretty artfully that you don't know what "better" means in consumer circles.

It means that people consider it better as a balance of factors, not justh aving features that are better. Yes, price and utility come into that. Right now, DVDs are better for the average consumer. Like I said, that will change, but it doesn't change the reality of what's up right now.

 But do the article say: Better for the average consumer? No it says dvd is better than blu-ray. And that is what I was reacting to. Blu-Ray have better quality. So, I could write an article that says Blu-Ray is better than dvd, and you would have said "no, not for me as an average consumer..ehh...". But then I`d step forward and say: "IT HAVE BETTER QUALITY, SO IT IS BETTER".  Then I`d make an clearer statement of the word BETTER  (^_^)

No, higher quality would not make it better. IGN's article was also speaking about consumer needs, not just quality.

If you think blu-ray is going to be better for everyone, I have a bridge to sell you.

The bridge is totally mine to sell, you see.

 

Haha. So who isn`t Blu-Ray better for? Those who wants bad quality? Yuk yuk. Let`s just state: If you got some rupees to spend, Blu-Ray si BETTER. Good night. I`m off too bed now. Thanks for the arguments :)