twesterm said:
Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
twesterm said:
Megadude said:
Upscaled DVD looks grainey on my LCD. Some people say they can't tell the difference. Some people cant tell the difference between a bird and a dildo. They are blind.
@ Twesterm: What's with the agenda? Banning people for talking about RROD, calling people fanboys because they enjoy bluray? kk |
Agenda? If you want to talk about your ban, PM me or naz, no need to bring it up here.
And why would I call people fanboys for liking BluRay? I myself like BluRay and even said so above if you had bothered reading the posts (it even says it in the first sentence of my first post). The people that I did say have fanboy blinders are the ones that refuse to acknowledge that BluRay does have its fair share of flaws.
- Price. It's more expensive and only marginally better in many peoples eyes
- It's not as portable. While you might have one BluRay player you probably have many things that play DVD'a
- Up-conversion. To people that aren't trained to see the high amount of detail they don't see or care about the difference between an upscaped DVD and a BluRay 1080p movie.
- Not all movies are available. If someone is going to buy a BluRay player they probably want to watch the movies they want. If the movies they want aren't coming out for it or the older movies they might want aren't released on BluRay, what is their incentive to spend the money?
|
Most of those were arguments for VHS over DVD (see links in my post above). What happened in time, though?
BTW, what do you mean "trained to see the high amounts of detail"? That's ridiculous! The AVERAGE human eyes sees about 9 to 10 MILLION pixels. Blu-ray is 2 million pixels. DVD is 345K pixels. So, that argument of yours is only for the misinformed.
|
So you want to bring up VHS to DVD and those points then?
- Price-- DVD's are not just marginally better to the average person than VHS, they are astronomically better. No rewindings, greatly improved quality that anyone can see, more space, chapter skipping, menu's, more durable. It's a huge improvement in every way over VHS. It was very much worth the price difference.
- Portability-- True, DVD devices were more just like BluRay devices are more today but portability wasn't an issue then. You didn't have a VHS player in your gaming system, computer, and in the 10 Tv's in your house. You could buy one DVD player and be good and not really worry about it.
- Not All Movies available-- Two years after DVD hit main stream every movie was coming out on DVD. I'll be nice though and give this point, though with the other points, the positives far outweigh the negatives.
And the training comment, "hardcore" gamers look for things like high resolution, your "girlfriend" doesn't. Those people who don't normally look for those things aren't going to see them. It would help if you actually read all of a post before commenting on it.
|
And by "hit the mainstream" you mean after the launch of the PS2, right? Because I assure you, having owned a DVD player in 2000, that 3 years into the format's life you most certainly could not find everything on DVD. Not even if we're only talking new releases at the time. Sure, by 2k2 that was no issue, once tens of millions had PS2s and tens of millions more had stand alone dvd players, but then we're talking 5 years into the format's life. See if you can make this same argument in another 2-3 years.
Really, there has not ever been a single argument that has crossed my path against Blu-Ray that wasn't said about DVD ten years ago. Not a single one. Even the idea of digital distribution as an up and coming challenger existed then. If I ever do see an anti-BR argument that wasn't used against DVD as well, I think my brain might explode forcing my eyes right out of their sockets.
