Ascended_Saiyan3 said:
DVD were NOT more durable than VHS (that's crazy talk). However, Blu-ray is MUCH more durable than DVD. Here is the funny part about the 1st sentence in your "Price" section. You say the picture quality was ASTRONOMICALLY better from VHS to DVD (272,160 pixels to 345,600 pixels). However, you want to say the picture quality from DVD to Blu-ray (345,600 pixels to 2,073,600 pixels) is not greater?! That's crazy talk by ALL accounts! You can't have it both ways. All NEW Hollywood blockbuster movie hit Blu-ray since the 2 year mark (about 6 months after HD DVD was defeated). The only exceptions are movie shot with a low rez camera (which makes perfect sense). Portability is sometime that came LATER with DVD. The same is expected with Blu-ray. Car players have been in the works, if it's not already out. Why can't people understand that these things take TIME (like ALL things)? Some people just don't know how to describe what they are seeing. Most "regular Joes" would just describe it as being "clearer" than other movies. That doesn't mean they have to "look" for it. They just need to know the terms to describe what they are seeing. Nothing more.
|
Did you even bother reading my posts or are you too busy waving your arms? I'll say it one more time and then I'll just ignore you every time after that when you start waving your arms and ignoring actual points I made.
- Disc media is much more durable than tape media, I don't know how else to put that. VHS movies are rarely clear and often have something funny with them and are often dirty. DVD's are simple to keep clean and ones I bought nearly 10 years ago work jut as well as they did today, that is rarely the case with VHS movies.
- I am not talking resolution, I don't give a crap about resolution at the moment. Nowhere have I even hinted at talking about that. I'll even bold this so hopefully it will stick-- I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT RESOLUTION AND PIXELS WHEN TALKING ABOUT QUALITY FROM VHS TO DVD. Do you ever remember having to play with tracking on a DVD? No, of course not. None of the many issues that come with VHS tapes comes with DVD's and that's what I'm talking about. That was a huge thing.
- I admitted I was off about the new releases comment.
- Portability-- If you had bothered reading my post, it just wasn't a common thing for people to have VHS players everywhere. That wasn't an issue then. Today, it's common for most household to have multiple ways to play DVD's. BluRay players are expensive so it is not common for people to have more than one. That means if you buy a BluRay movie then you can only take advantage of one player. It is going to be a long time until the average family will have multiple ways to play BluRay movies.
- You could not imagine how many "regular joes" I know that just don't see the difference or just don't care about the difference. Outside of techy people or super AV video, most people don't care about the difference between an upscaled DVD and a 1080p movie. A lot of older people (lets say 35+) don't see and don't understand the difference.
So yeah, BluRay still has a long way to go. Just like I said earlier, I like my BluRay movies and I buy them when I can but people shouldn't be so resistant to the idea that BluRay still has many negatives and it is not nearly as large as a jump as VHS to DVD was.








