SpartanFX said:
no i think they didn't want PS3 to hinder the sales of PS2 since PS2 returns a good profit while PS3 doesn't. |
As a consumer, that pisses me off. Sony actually went to extra trouble to keep me from having something that they gave away for free early on, just so I'd have to buy an inferior version of the previously free thing for 100 dollars. It's basically a price increase on what was at the time a 599 dollar console. You got less for your money.
Then again, "less for your money" is a reoccouring theme with Sony this generation, and thus, they are and shall forever be third with their Playstation 3.
Give me the reigns of that company 2.5 years ago, and the Wii would be sweating right now.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.







