I understand what you're saying, I have the whole time, but I still stand by what I said. What's with the personal insults?
You knowingly exclude data (less than 10m sellers) and then think you can make a rational conclusion based on third party sales? His post only covered 10m+ sellers, but that in no way should be taken as the ultimatum for third party sales, that's ridiculous. That's not even the point he was trying to make, so you were twisting his post around to make your silly conclusion. He never said that the list should be indicative of overall third party sales, yet that's how you took it. You took his post and twisted it into a conclusion that fit your argument. Great going.
Someone told him that there were many more 10+ PS million sellers than Nintendo million sellers, so he made a list to prove them wrong. That's all he did. You took his post and twisted it around, pretending that he made it a "rational" conclusion to prove that third party games have better sales on HD consoles.
Speaking of which, why did your post turn to HD? His list consisted of games on the PS brand and the Nintendo brand. Not only did he NOT mention the 360, but NONE of the consoles he mentioned in that 10m+ list were HD consoles!
That makes your conclusion even more far fetched. Nice going.
