Why the PSN fails and how to improve it ~ Do you agree with this article?

[darthdevidem01]

kowenicki said:
People here can say what they like...

The FACT remains that as an integrated GAMING service... LIVE is superior to PSN. It just is.. and anyone with both knows this.

The subjective stuff aroun d how the serv ices are laid out, hoe the contenet is delivered is not the issue.

If I am gaming online and I want to communicate in any game to any game, invite, set up a party, chat, jump in and out of games with friends, check achievements, check content etc LIVE wins.

I don't want to communicate in all games.....I have no intention of speaking to strangers online randomly.

I can invite my friends in motorstorm PR....or I can send them a message to come n play this game with me...no big deal

I can set up a party in HOME

I can check trophies when I'm playing say Fallout 3

OH AND SOON...I can go on my internet browser while in-game

_______

AND its free

 

F-R-E-E (This alone makes it > Live.....as I would'nt be an online gamer right now if PSN was paid...my parents would refuse to pay for it)