By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kasz216 said:
highwaystar101 said:
I think that it is foolish to believe in a personal god because you have zero chance of getting it right. However, I wont dismiss the possibility of a creator per se, if someone could show me evidence for a creator I would be open to reading it, but it needs to be scientific and logical. Not just 'mr X said that he was son of god Y and it says this in book Z, which a fair few millenia old, follow it blindly sinner', which happens far too much and I'm sure most of you notice I go from nice to hostile when that happens.

Premise 1: We are soon on the verge of developing computers that will be able to recreate human minds

Premise 2: As such, we could develop computers that could recreate an entire world or even solar system.

 

Logical conclusion: If this technology became available, we would use it to create these "false" worlds for research, also likely for entertainment.  These false worlds when technologically advanced enough would create there own false worlds.

Logical Conclusion 2: Therefore it's logical to assume that the odds of being a "real" world vs a "fake" world are very small even in a universe that wouldn't have a god.

Logical Conclusion 3:  It's statistically probable we are living in a false world.  AKA a world created by someone else.  It is statistically probably a creator exists.

 

So you think we've been created by some person trying to do research? Yeah...

And it is not statistically probable, to simulate a world as complex as ours is almost impossible. There are billions of human beings on this earth and even more animals, insects, etc. We are far from being "soon" to develop such computers