sharky974 said:
False.
PS3 and 360 are essentially the same experience, just a slight variation on it. Most people will only buy one or the other.
One of the reasons Wii's "dominance" has been I believe vastly oversold while hardcore gamers are shortchanged is the simple fact that for sales numbers the hardcore/hi def market is divided in two (PS3 and 360) while the causual/waggle market only has one contender.
Imagine if the situation were reversed. Let us say PS3 was never released, so at least 80-90% of PS3 buyers each month would likely buy a 360 instead. Let us say also Apple had introduced a waggle console. Lets say we see this typical monthly NPD today: Wii 600k 360 300k PS3 200k In the no Ps3/Apple waggle scenario, it would look like this:
360 500k Wii 350k Apple Wagglebox 250K
Nothing actually changed but I'd be willing to bet the mainstream pundits would have a massively different view on things. Suddenly the 360 would be portrayed as dominating and the Wii and Apple console as failures. When really nothing at all changed regarding the casual versus hardcore market share. The casual was simply split in two as the hardcore is today.
Also besides all that, if you add the DS to Wii then you must also add the PSP (it is more of a non casual "system") to PS3 and you lose even worse lol. That's just stupid. Leave handhelds out of this.
|
You do know that just because something has competition you can't give them a free pass right because that is what you're trying to do.
Also, you might want to add up the PS3, PSP, and 360 and compare them to the Wii and Ds numbers before making a statement like you did at the end.








