| Tyrannical said: Oh well, at least 70K JP get the version with the superior graphics. MS really should be pimping those Eurogamer graphic analysis. The cheaper 360 almost always gets the superior graphics. Why pay more for a PS3 just to get the lesser version? |
Holy Shit! The shadows man!!! The shadows!!! Now I can't play RE5 on my PS3 cause the shadows just don't do it for me!!!
Really man these graphics comparisons are really lame. I own a PS3 already and the shadow/water differences aren't gonna make me go out and buy a 360 just to play this game. Even if I did have both systems I would still get the PS3 version just because I can play RE 1-4 on my PS3(Which I'm doing right now) so I can catch up on my RE story. I also have RE0 for the Gamecube as well ;)
These arguments remind me of when I read GameInformer a few years ago and they compared a NHL game on both the PS2/GC/Xbox and the Xbox got a higher score on graphics cause the ice was more shiny LMAO! XD
Graphic Whores today are worse than they ever have been. But... but... the X system has more bore butterflies on screen then the Y systems. Who gives a crap.
FootballFan - "GT has never been bigger than Halo. Now do a comparison between the two attach ratios and watch GT get stomped by Halo. Reach will sell 5 million more than GT5. Quote me on it."
