Gnizmo on 11 March 2009
| stof said: I still don't get this whole "cash in" angle. Is it a cash in because it will recount story events from existing games in the series? Because then REmake was just as cheap cash in. Is it a cash in because it's a rail shooter? Because then RE:UC was a cheap cash in and that game rocked. Or is it a cash in because Railshooters are so short? Because Umbrella Chronicles had hours and hours of gameplay. Is it a cash in because it isn't RE 5? The game that was announced for PS3 and 360 long before the Revolution had even been unveiled? Because that's just silly. I'd just like someone to explain to me how a sequel to a very successful and fun game that had lots of effort and polish is going to be a cheap cash in. |
I have to assume its because they wanted a different game. "Cheap cash-in" has simply become the default insult for any Wii game. Anytime a game is announced for the Wii there is a collection of people screaming cheap cash-in simply because they don't like the idea of the game. I seem to recall people saying de Blob and Boom Blox were cheap cash-ins as well.
