What Game Did you Prefer and Why Infinite Undiscovery or The Last Remnant?

[outlawauron]

g-value said:

outlawauron said:

mrstickball said:
What about ToV was unpolished? I've never had any frame issues (despite a dozen+ enemies on screen, while using many artes), has almost no loading times, and so on. It's the most polished JRPG the X360 offers.

LO was 'mostly' polished, compared to other JRPGs on the 360, but was less polished than PS2 counterparts.

The level of quality (and then effort) across the game wasn't equal. By the ending alone, you can tell they were trying to go ahead be done with it. The level of voice acting is very good for the main characters, but everyone else is pretty terrible. (I laughed whenever Zagi would speak)

Next, I'd say the animation the cutscenes wasn't very good either. What sticks out the most was from Ehmead Hill in the demo level. The little karate chop to the next thing, goodness. I think that Tales is the most polished 360 RPG, but that doesn't make a polished game.

(And Meteor Storm + Holy Lance + Luna Gale + Lone Wolf Storm = <10 FPS)

What do you expect from a fast pace REAL TIME battle system. Of course there are going to be some frame issues but other then that ToV was very well polished.

It is quite polished for a Tales game.

I just don't think it's quite up there with some other JRPGs in the same area.